"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
01/08/2019 at 10:42 • Filed to: None | 5 | 7 |
But my God it has aged horribly.
KingT- 60% of the time, it works every time
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
01/08/2019 at 10:49 | 5 |
Irony, thy name is Volkswagen
CarsofFortLangley - Oppo Forever
> KingT- 60% of the time, it works every time
01/08/2019 at 10:53 | 4 |
Who would have known the actual green police would later arrest some VW execs for the same vehicle.
Chariotoflove
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
01/08/2019 at 11:00 | 2 |
That’s beautiful.
Urambo Tauro
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
01/08/2019 at 11:12 | 1 |
I totally forgot about this ad! I’m surprised I haven’t seen any of my fellow commenters posting it in Dieselgate articles. This is honestly the first time I’ve even thought of it in years .
interstate366, now In The Industry
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
01/08/2019 at 11:12 | 2 |
The TDI part has aged horribly, sure. The rest is disturbingly plausible.
Rusty Vandura - www.tinyurl.com/keepoppo
> KingT- 60% of the time, it works every time
01/08/2019 at 11:13 | 0 |
No doubt. The question is, to what extent is “clean” diesel a hoax overall? Was VW the only company to get caught in the act?
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> interstate366, now In The Industry
01/08/2019 at 11:15 | 0 |
Also true